Privacy in the Age of Technology essays

Privacy in the Age of Technology essays Privacy is the right to be left alone to do what you want in secret. All across the nation our privacy is being exploited by companies, criminals and drug users. There used to be a time when we could be confident that no one could learn too much about our personal lives. There used to be a time when information was merely a way of keeping records. That time is gone and with it went a large amount of what we might call our personal privacy. Is technology to blame for our loss of privacy? The world is changing rapidly and technology has a lot to do with it. In the essay Invasion of Privacy by Joshua Quittner many details suggest the numerous ways we are losing our privacy. Quittner states that like many of us he did not think of his privacy as much. "For the longest time, I couldn't get worked p about privacy: my right to it; how it's dying; how we're headed for an even more wired, underregulated, overintrusive, privacy-deprived planet."" He took his privacy for granted until some one seized his phone. The person didn't do anything bad with it but Quittner realized that the person could have done real serious damage to him "he could have sabotaged my credit rating. He could have eavesdropped on my telephone conversations or siphoned off my E- Mail. He could have called in my mortgage, discontinued my health insurance or obliterated my Social Security Number."" He felt violated like most people would have in his position. Keep in mind that was just a person h acking another person's phone and look at all the things they could have done. Have you ever gotten the feeling your being watched but don't know by who. Its ok your not going crazy Quittner says in his essay "we submit to being photographed every day- 20 times a day on average if you live or work in New York City- by surveillance cameras."" Its creepy I know. Also did you know each time someone uses the ATM, visits the doctor, uses a credit card, chats on the int...

A Case Study for a Business Organization

A Case Study for a Business Organization Betty can operate her business in various ways, which include a franchise, a sole proprietorship, a corporation, a limited liability company and a partnership. To start with, a limited liability (LLC) company is a business enterprise, which blends the characteristics of a partnership and a sole proprietorship.Advertising We will write a custom case study sample on A Case Study for a Business Organization specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More This entity gives a limited liability to the shareholders of the company. In which case, if a business goes under during its existence, one can only sue the business as an entity without affecting the legal entity of the individual shareholders. This goes off as a major advantage for this entity (Harold 1983). On the other hand, when two or more people come together to operate a business, they form a partnership. At start up, or during the operation of the business, each partner contributes an agreed s hare of the resources required to run the business. This can be in terms of labor, money, land, and at the end gains a reward depending on an agreed formula. Under the current US laws, a partnership does not pay income tax. However, the shareholders of this entity must file their respective shares of the entity’s profits and losses in their individual tax returns (Cooke 1950). On its part, a corporation is a legal entity incorporated through registration and with legal rights and liabilities. Corporations are on their own, entities with a board of directors heading them. The other business form, which Betty can undertake, is a franchise. In this business form, a franchisor allows the franchisee to use his trademark and distribute the trademarked goods or services (Cooke 1950). For a start up business as Betty is intending to operate, a franchise is the most appropriate model to adopt. Here, Betty gets an already established brand name, which would help her a great deal in min imizing losses during the break-even period. As well, almost all franchisors provide business training and technical knowhow to their franchisees. She would access the much-needed knowhow for her startup venture (Gurnick 2011). It would be necessary for Betty to join hands with other interested investors to operate the business. One of the interested investors is her husband only wants to contribute capital to the business. Another interested person is Erma a non-Christian. Erma, though not Christian, shares Betty’s vision of a â€Å"Christian coffee place†, and would provide an invaluable contribution to the business. It is important to point out that the vision of any organization is what drives it and as such, Erma would come in as an essential stakeholder in this venture.Advertising Looking for case study on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More On the other hand, Betty’s siste r, Alice comes off as dispassionate and does not identify with the venture’s mission. She lacks the energy that would contribute to the success of the business. It would be suicidal for Betty to accept her solely on the reason that she wants to get out of the house. Betty should explain these reasons to her sister. The name â€Å"The Gathering Place† is most appropriate for the coffeehouse. However, a search at the State of North Carolina’s registry reveals that the name is already in use by a nonprofit organization. For that reason, it would be illegal for her to use the name for trade marking purposes. However, most franchisors already have an established brand name. Betty could choose to use the franchisor’s name for her coffeehouse instead of dwelling on choosing a new one. References Cooke, C.A. (1950). Corporation, Trust and Company: A legal History. New York: Oxford University Press. Gurnick, D. T. (2011). Distribution law of the United States. U.S .: Juris. Harold, J. B. (1983). The Impact of Limited Liability and Control. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.

Partnership like relationships exists between consumers and suppliers Essay

Partnership like relationships exists between consumers and suppliers and provides advantages such as greater quality - Essay Example Theoretical frameworks exist in abundant supply that try to delineate the advantages of close cooperation between partners in supply chain mechanisms. In practice however things are far more different as the specific attributes of such working relationships are not fully understood (Goffin, 2006). Overall there has been a move towards close cooperation based relationships though the actual realised benefits of such relationships is not fully established and is generally overestimated. The range of relationships between various entities in the supply chain domain varies from transactional type relationships to close and more collaborative relationships. Another issue of importance that needs clarification is the use of the term â€Å"partnership† that has been used to describe such relationships though there is no legal or other justification for using such a term. The use of the term â€Å"partnership† has caused confusion in respect of these relationships on a number o f fronts though three major reasons are more significant. These reasons are: Customer / supplier relationships are purely business relationships though they may be described as partnerships. However the use of the term does not indicate any legal privileges are inferred as in the case of a business partnership or alliance. This clearly demonstrates that customer / supplier partnerships do not carry any legal value and are instead purely voluntary in nature; Any partnership like relationships between supply chain entities are not absolute but are rather context dependent. The extent of closeness of the subject relationship determines the variations in such relationships and previous research supports such contentions (Ellram, 1991) (Saxton, 1997). It can be inferred from this that the particular degree of closeness in a relationship provides the necessary insight to explore such relationships although the degree of closeness is not absolute; Relationships based on the partnership mod el alone cannot attempt to explain the supplier side of relationships fully although this is universally assumed as such (Goffin, 2006). A large amount of material exists on the value of close customer and supplier relationships although this is not relevant to the issue at hand. Instead this text will focus more on why such close relationships are not performing as desired or expected using three different approaches. These approaches include: assessing the appropriateness of close relationships between customers and suppliers; creation of and sustainability of close relationships between customers and suppliers; contextual nature of close relationships between customers and suppliers. 1. Appropriateness The majority of literature on relationships between suppliers and customers has implied that close relationships are desirable though such literature has failed to provide due consideration to any contextual causes or to the effectiveness of such relationships. As an example a larg e amount of literature has concentrated on implying that manufacturers and their suppliers should have close relationships and have indicated that these relationships have evolved into partnerships over the last two decades. However such literature has failed to account for a few transactional relationships that not only exist but are also desirable. Similarly there has been talk of evolution of such relations